Go Back   Pojo.com Forums > Yu-Gi-Oh! > Yu-Gi-Oh TCG "Advanced" Deck Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-12-2011, 01:02 AM   #1
Bulleht
wait! WHAT?
 
Bulleht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Age: 23
Posts: 666
iTrader: 0
Default Anti-MOTHER*BEEP*-Plants

Hey Guys.
I've always played anti, and i thought about playing the plants. So why not put some anti in the deck?

3 Caius
3 Doomcaliber
3 Debris
3 Ryko
2 Snowman
2 Dandy
2 Lonefire
1 Sangan
1 Tytannial
1 Spore
1 Card Trooper
1 Glow-Up Bulb
1 Spirit Reaper

3 Book
2 Duality
2 PoA
1 Cold Wave
1 Trunade
1 Foolish
1 Reborn
1 Dark Hole

2 Warning
1 Solemn
1 Mirror
1 TT

Synchro:
1 Mist Wurm
1 Chimeratech fortress
1 Colossal
2 Stardust
1 Scrap Dragon
2 Black Rose
1 Gungnir
1 Brionac
1 Goyo
1 Iron Chain
1 Catastor
1 Android
1 Armory Arm

Staple in the side deck:
3 Decree
2 MST
1 Gorz

So what do you guys think? R/F like you what, but let there be a reason for it.

Additional Comment:

Isn't there anyone, who got the expertise/knowlegde?
__________________
Mod edit: Your sig image was WAY too big. Our limits are 500 x 125 and 30 KB. Yours was 375 × 212 and 2,232.85 KB.

Quote:
Originally Posted by UTurnMeOn View Post
Bullet you are so cool.
Quote:
Originally Posted by UTurnMeOn View Post
Bullet you are so boss.

Last edited by Bulleht : 01-20-2011 at 02:20 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Bulleht is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2011, 01:26 AM   #2
MythIntoLegend
Baned User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,362
iTrader: 0
Default

Misleading name, I thought this was meant to be an Anti-Plant deck.

Personally, I would try to make room for a One for One, it can really set the deck off when played at the right time.

Maybe find a better card than Tytanial? I mean she IS good, however I think that there could be something better than her in this deck. Maybe LaDD?
MythIntoLegend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2011, 01:36 AM   #3
Bulleht
wait! WHAT?
 
Bulleht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Age: 23
Posts: 666
iTrader: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MythIntoLegend View Post
Misleading name, I thought this was meant to be an Anti-Plant deck.

Personally, I would try to make room for a One for One, it can really set the deck off when played at the right time.

Maybe find a better card than Tytanial? I mean she IS good, however I think that there could be something better than her in this deck. Maybe LaDD?
It's Plants, with some anti in it.
I've thought about LADD, but it should be in the side. I never tribute summon Tytannial,, always SS it, with lonefire.
__________________
Mod edit: Your sig image was WAY too big. Our limits are 500 x 125 and 30 KB. Yours was 375 × 212 and 2,232.85 KB.

Quote:
Originally Posted by UTurnMeOn View Post
Bullet you are so cool.
Quote:
Originally Posted by UTurnMeOn View Post
Bullet you are so boss.
Bulleht is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2011, 01:39 AM   #4
MythIntoLegend
Baned User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,362
iTrader: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulleht View Post
It's Plants, with some anti in it.
I've thought about LADD, but it should be in the side. I never tribute summon Tytannial,, always SS it, with lonefire.
Mhmm, however I find Tytannial to be a bit risky, because when you draw into it, its going to sit in your hand for a REALLY long time, either that or you're going to -2 yourself to get it onto the field. Which is why I am suggesting you find an alternative card that can generate +1s while not being a liability if drawn [at least not a heavy liability].

Personally, I've always wanted to see someone tech Gigaplant. [Although it is a bit slow]
MythIntoLegend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2011, 05:59 AM   #5
Bulleht
wait! WHAT?
 
Bulleht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Age: 23
Posts: 666
iTrader: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MythIntoLegend View Post
Mhmm, however I find Tytannial to be a bit risky, because when you draw into it, its going to sit in your hand for a REALLY long time, either that or you're going to -2 yourself to get it onto the field. Which is why I am suggesting you find an alternative card that can generate +1s while not being a liability if drawn [at least not a heavy liability].

Personally, I've always wanted to see someone tech Gigaplant. [Although it is a bit slow]
I know, that is why i only play one.
I don't think that gigatech is the right card in this kinda deck. with all the non-plants i'm running.

Additional Comment:

Bumping this baby up.
__________________
Mod edit: Your sig image was WAY too big. Our limits are 500 x 125 and 30 KB. Yours was 375 × 212 and 2,232.85 KB.

Quote:
Originally Posted by UTurnMeOn View Post
Bullet you are so cool.
Quote:
Originally Posted by UTurnMeOn View Post
Bullet you are so boss.

Last edited by Bulleht : 01-12-2011 at 05:59 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Bulleht is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2011, 06:06 AM   #6
purple whatevers
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 78
iTrader: 0
Default

Deck lacks Raioh
purple whatevers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2011, 03:00 PM   #7
Bulleht
wait! WHAT?
 
Bulleht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Age: 23
Posts: 666
iTrader: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by purple whatevers View Post
Deck lacks Raioh
Side-decket.

Additional Comment:

Bump

Filler
__________________
Mod edit: Your sig image was WAY too big. Our limits are 500 x 125 and 30 KB. Yours was 375 × 212 and 2,232.85 KB.

Quote:
Originally Posted by UTurnMeOn View Post
Bullet you are so cool.
Quote:
Originally Posted by UTurnMeOn View Post
Bullet you are so boss.

Last edited by Bulleht : 01-12-2011 at 03:00 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Bulleht is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2011, 03:15 PM   #8
Lorentzen
Registered User
 
Lorentzen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Denmark, Hvidovre 2650
Posts: 311
iTrader: 2 (100%)
Default

remove tyttanial, it kills your deck, btw August and Bentzen don't use it either
Lorentzen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2011, 11:43 PM   #9
Bulleht
wait! WHAT?
 
Bulleht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Age: 23
Posts: 666
iTrader: 0
Default

Bumping this baby up!
__________________
Mod edit: Your sig image was WAY too big. Our limits are 500 x 125 and 30 KB. Yours was 375 × 212 and 2,232.85 KB.

Quote:
Originally Posted by UTurnMeOn View Post
Bullet you are so cool.
Quote:
Originally Posted by UTurnMeOn View Post
Bullet you are so boss.
Bulleht is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2011, 12:00 AM   #10
mike_leahcim
Registered User
 
mike_leahcim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 95
iTrader: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lorentzen View Post
remove tyttanial, it kills your deck, btw August and Bentzen don't use it either
Do Not listen to these guys, Keep Tytanial she wins duels.
mike_leahcim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2011, 12:21 AM   #11
alanisnotcool
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 398
iTrader: 0
Default

yea Tytanial is the only card that beats me in this deck ever
alanisnotcool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2011, 02:35 AM   #12
Bulleht
wait! WHAT?
 
Bulleht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Age: 23
Posts: 666
iTrader: 0
Default

Update with side and extra.

Additional Comment:

should i play 3 PoA?
__________________
Mod edit: Your sig image was WAY too big. Our limits are 500 x 125 and 30 KB. Yours was 375 × 212 and 2,232.85 KB.

Quote:
Originally Posted by UTurnMeOn View Post
Bullet you are so cool.
Quote:
Originally Posted by UTurnMeOn View Post
Bullet you are so boss.

Last edited by Bulleht : 01-20-2011 at 02:35 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Bulleht is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2011, 02:38 AM   #13
teamdarkarmed
.?!
 
teamdarkarmed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,190
iTrader: -2 (0%)
Default

hey, my glads run dck so i cant say sh**, although if you have it out you cant do much...id say swap dck for thunders
__________________
95% of Yu-Gi-Oh players lack imaginations and use Cookie Cutter decks. If you're one of the 5% who uses creative decks, put this in your sig
Trolololololololololololololo

Deckz
Searcher Spam
Tier -0 Trent- otk
Spirits
And the list
teamdarkarmed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2011, 02:55 AM   #14
Bulleht
wait! WHAT?
 
Bulleht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Age: 23
Posts: 666
iTrader: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by teamdarkarmed View Post
hey, my glads run dck so i cant say sh**, although if you have it out you cant do much...id say swap dck for thunders
I played Stun Gadgets before, and i'm going to use DCK like in the gadgets. If you got DCK on the field, then just don't play any monster effects. plain simple, and DCK is just FANTASTIC in this format.
__________________
Mod edit: Your sig image was WAY too big. Our limits are 500 x 125 and 30 KB. Yours was 375 × 212 and 2,232.85 KB.

Quote:
Originally Posted by UTurnMeOn View Post
Bullet you are so cool.
Quote:
Originally Posted by UTurnMeOn View Post
Bullet you are so boss.
Bulleht is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2011, 02:57 AM   #15
teamdarkarmed
.?!
 
teamdarkarmed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,190
iTrader: -2 (0%)
Default

true but in gadgets you could still rai oh and stuff..
__________________
95% of Yu-Gi-Oh players lack imaginations and use Cookie Cutter decks. If you're one of the 5% who uses creative decks, put this in your sig
Trolololololololololololololo

Deckz
Searcher Spam
Tier -0 Trent- otk
Spirits
And the list
teamdarkarmed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2011, 05:47 AM   #16
Bulleht
wait! WHAT?
 
Bulleht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Age: 23
Posts: 666
iTrader: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by teamdarkarmed View Post
true but in gadgets you could still rai oh and stuff..
Yeah, but DCK is better in this format, then Rai-Oh.

Additional Comment:

bumping for new suggestions.
__________________
Mod edit: Your sig image was WAY too big. Our limits are 500 x 125 and 30 KB. Yours was 375 × 212 and 2,232.85 KB.

Quote:
Originally Posted by UTurnMeOn View Post
Bullet you are so cool.
Quote:
Originally Posted by UTurnMeOn View Post
Bullet you are so boss.

Last edited by Bulleht : 01-20-2011 at 05:47 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Bulleht is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

 
Advertisement


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.