Rup, Emma, or Dan?

[Perfect Cell]

Of the three who do you think shows more talent for acting and plays thier part the best?
Rupert Grint?
Emma Watson?
Daniel Radcliffe?
It hink it is Emm > Dan >Rup

[Village Dag]

Probably Emma aswell. She showed Hermione's bossiness pretty well I reckon.

[nIgHtFiRe239]

I think it's Emma.

[Overlord Zatenks]

That is easy. Emma followed by Rupert and Daniel. Emma is believable and she is quite expressive. Her almost-crying scene in Chamber of Secrets was somewhat touching. In the case of Rupert, he is pretty good, though he seems to make goofy faces more than anything else. Daniel gets the point across, but he is a bit stale. His arsenal of facial expressions is very limited.

[Perfect Cell]

Can't remember when does she cry in the chamber of Secrets. Rupert is prolly better than Harry but you wouldn't know because all he ever gets to say is bloody hell.

[Detonator]

I am gonna say emma first and dan last. I think Dan is boring to watch caz he really isn't a great actor.

[RCG_]

I actually think Dan is the best and has come the farthest. With the most pressure put on him, he's made me believe he IS Harry and considering what a freak I am about HP, that's considered an excellent job where I come from. Emma has probably gotten the best critical reviews, but I think they're all doing a fantastic job and deserve equal praise.

[Charninja]

Emma, duh. With her... must... resist... impure... thoughts...

[Mystic Reaper]

dude, no1 can resist against inpure thoughts about emma, cos she is the best actress and the bossy thing kinda is a turn on........

[Overlord Zatenks]

Daniel may get the job done, but in terms of just plain acting skills and the ability to be expressive, Emma takes the cake. My problem with Daniel is not the way he talks or says his lines, but his limited palette of facial expressions. He will say a line with emotion, but with a stale look on his face. He needs to be more expressive. While he is not bad for an amateur, he is not as good as Emma. Emma has a lot going for her, and I think she is more likely to continue her acting career after she is finished with Harry Potter. And although I am many years her senior, it is more than obvious that Emma is becoming a complete knock out. So when she is finished with these movies, her looks as well as acting should land her other roles. I cannot see Dan continuing his career after Harry Potter.

[Village Dag]

Originally Posted by Mystic Reaper

dude, no1 can resist against inpure thoughts about emma, cos she is the best actress and the bossy thing kinda is a turn on........

Dude, have you forgotten there's Michelle Pfeiffer? Now she is a knockout looker.

[maskedgoomba]

Not to be a cop-out or anything, but they each have certain strengths. I mean in PoA, Dan acting is above par, 'specially the scene after he comes out the leaky cauldron. Rupert, well... the guy just has awesome delievery when it comes to comedic lines, and Emma is just an all-rounder in everything.

However, when it comes down to it... 1) Emma 2)Dan 3)Rupert

[Emperor Anubis]

Originally Posted by Perfect Cell

Emma > Dan >Rup

I agree. My message was too short before I wrote this

[GundamGuy_UK]

Many people say Dan was too flat in his acting. But the thing is, Harry was like that really. You can't act better than the role you've got, and for that reason Dan's pretty good.

Though I agree with most people, and say that Emma is the best one. And not just because she's hot. All 3 are good, though Rupert is the only one to have another film role other than in HP. Admittedly, that other film looks a complete pile of bull, and I'll never see it, but its a credit to him I suppose.

[TheOneSin]

Originally Posted by Charninja

Emma, duh. With her... must... resist... impure... thoughts...

YES!!! Someone else that thinks she's good in that way. I think that Dan/Emma>Emma/Dan(respectively)>Rup, but I have to put in a side note, Emma has gotten to look really...nice...in a simple word.