View Full Version : The Ultimate Cyberdark Build?
Feugan
09-15-2008, 04:45 AM
Hello again! Some may remember me from my string of Cyberdark builds, and I am also the author of the Cyberdark guide (See sig)
I've managed to aquire a fair amount of money so I'm starting the "Ultimate Cyberdark Build" project. I've started out with a fairly solid decklist and I could do with help. Please leave a rating and a fix, thanks :)
My idea here is to create the 'Ultimate' Cyberdark build. I want as many people as possible to help out!
:D
Monsters [22];
[2] Dark Armed Dragon
[3] Cyberdark Horn
[3] Cyberdark Edge
[2] Cyberdark Keel
[1] Dark Grepher
[2] Armageddon Knight
[3] Hunter Dragon
[3] Necro Gardna
[2] DD Crow
[1] Breaker the Magical Warrior
Spells [11];
[1] Limiter Removal
[3] Reinforcement of the Army
[1] Heavy Storm
[3] Allure of Darkness
[2] Foolish Burial
[1] Burial from a Different Dimension
Traps [8];
[3] Solemn Judgement
[2] Phoenix Wing Wind Blast
[1] Mirror Force
[1] Torrential Tribute
[1] Crush Card Virus
Nishimaster
09-15-2008, 04:48 AM
Hello again! Some may remember me from my string of Cyberdark builds, and I am also the author of the Cyberdark guide (See sig) :)
I've managed to aquire a fair amount of money so I'm starting the "Ultimate Cyberdark Build" project. I've started out with a fairly solid decklist and I could do with help. Please leave a rating and a fix, thanks :)
Monsters [21]
[2] Dark Armed Dragon
[3] Cyberdark Horn
[3] Cyberdark Edge
[2] Cyberdark Keel
[1] Dark Grepher
[2] Armageddon Knight
[3] Necro Gardna
[3] DD Crow
[1] Breaker the Magical Warrior
[1] Sangan
Spells [11];
[1] Limit Removal
[3] Reinforcement of the Army
[1] Heavy Storm
[3] Allure of Darkness
[2] Foolish Burial
[1] Burial from a Different Dimension
Traps [8];
[3] Solemn Judgement
[2] Phoenix Wing Wind Blast
[1] Mirror Force
[1] Torrential Tribute
[1] Crush Card Virus
lol no hunter dragons
facepalm
Feugan
09-15-2008, 05:01 AM
Hard to make a cyberdark deck with no hunter dragons :/
//T
<<Mega Facepalm>> (For when a fail is so epic)
Sorry, Mr. I HAVE PLAYED CYBERDARKS FOR SO LONG
and if you want to get technical, it's quite easy to make a Cyberdark deck without Hunter Dragons -.-
Sorry to everyone else about that, any suggestions?
Mr.Miyagi
09-15-2008, 05:06 AM
looks good, but is 3 reinforcements too many. You only have 6 warriors that may be pushing it.
nice deck though 9/10 nice to see someone being creative.
mind looking at my deck, link in sig. thanks and good luck!
Terano
09-15-2008, 06:42 AM
Well, TO BE TECHNICAL
You didn't have ANY level 3 or lower dragons.
//T
Feugan
09-15-2008, 10:38 AM
Why would I run Heart of the Underdog???
Nishimaster
09-15-2008, 10:59 AM
Well
It's like Veil of Darkness but more shapesnatchy!
GGled
09-15-2008, 11:20 AM
Maybe POSSIBLY consider adding in a Veil of Darkness? And I'm NOT just saying that to get you to trade mine off me. *Shifty eyes*
But yeah, definitely the most solid Cyberdark build I've seen. I can tell you have experience with them ;)
Feugan
09-15-2008, 11:22 AM
Thanks for the input GG.
:)
Abraxas
09-15-2008, 11:32 AM
I would say one more Keel is a thing you have to put in... And what's up with Future Fusion and Overload-Fusion? You can use both for Cyberdark Dragon. I would run them. Get rid of one Rota, one Foolish and Mirror Force.
Feugan
09-15-2008, 11:40 AM
Dude.... what the hell? XD
Cyberdark Dragon isnt brilliant. Beatdown is the best, and Keel is the worst lol.
Foolish = Staple in such a graveyard-based deck, same with triple RotA that allows Grepher to be in my opening hand and Army Knights late game, and Mirror Force is a staple in my book.
Although if you have credible reasons for such fixes then I'm all ears :)
GGled
09-15-2008, 11:45 AM
LOL!
That's a GREAT IDEA, let's put in Future and Overload to summon a monster that doesn't really have any decent targets, seeing as he wouldn't want to summon F.G.D. And even if he was, he'd use Cyberdark Impact! instead of Future/Overload.
raimoondo
09-15-2008, 12:50 PM
try adding in a couple of Cyberdark Impact! and get some Cyberdark Dragons for ur extra deck, since it has a pretty good target for when needed(DAD if its in the gy) other than that it looks pretty solid
Abraxas
09-15-2008, 12:59 PM
I thought you wanna play all Cyberdark Monsters and have some Dragons in your extra deck. Thought wrong, sorry. I'm not as ******ed. And I think if you search your Armageddonknight or Grepher by Rota, you don't really need two Foolish Burial, too. I like Mirror Force, too, I'd never let it out of my deck, but I prefer all the other traps in your lineup, so MF was the only choice I made. Didn't know you just wanna use the Cyberdarks for beatdown... Because there are many other beatdown decks I like better, but it's okay. (Yeah, the Dragon smells like rotten bananas..)
Feugan
09-15-2008, 01:27 PM
Foolish is faster, and it's limited to 2, hence the backup of Armageddon and Grepher. Cyberdarks work better as a beatdown with good support rather than a 'Jack-of-all-trades' with fusions whose support is spread too thinly. I do play all Cyberdarks except 1 Keel; 9 is too many and Keel is by far the worst.
Terano
09-19-2008, 04:33 AM
Have you tried... -1 breaker, +1 Trapdustshoot?
Etna iCe
09-25-2008, 10:47 AM
Why no Cyberdark Impact! ? >_>
Feugan
09-26-2008, 03:13 AM
CdIp! is for the fusion (Obv...) and whenever I used to use it, it became a dead draw much of the time. Hence why I took it out for this more reliable build. (I still keep it in my collection though; took me ages to find! :D)
GGled
09-26-2008, 10:07 AM
You should run one to attach DAD to the Dragon ;)
sealedpaladin
10-13-2008, 11:11 PM
CdIp! is for the fusion (Obv...) and whenever I used to use it, it became a dead draw much of the time. Hence why I took it out for this more reliable build. (I still keep it in my collection though; took me ages to find! :D)
hiya like the build mega loads because im actually looking to do the same thing with the dads and crush. anyways i think having 1 cyberdark impact! is a good idea just as a last resort top deck thing otherwise its always a gd card to discard for costs.
also just woundered if you have thought about puting in complusory evacuation devices in, since the current meta is to use draws and malicious sending malicious to the players hand when they are about to summon a monster is always a good way to give you an opening, and speaking of openings maybe if you put in dust tornados they can seriously help you create an opening by destroying an opponents s/t during the end phase then setting a phoenix wing wind blast in the same end phase ready to use after you draw to send your opponents monster flying to the top of their deck creating what could possobly be a wide open field for 2500 beatdown
another idea is destruction jammer since its kinda like solemn judgement and you can always send your hunters or necros to the grave as costs, lemme know what you think
GGled
10-14-2008, 10:22 AM
Maybe run Creature Swap? Summon a Cyberdark, don't activate it's effect but swap it for their Stardust, Colossal Fighter or Thought Ruler Archfiend.
darkmagicattack
10-14-2008, 01:21 PM
Maybe run Creature Swap? Summon a Cyberdark, don't activate it's effect but swap it for their Stardust, Colossal Fighter or Thought Ruler Archfiend.
cyberdarks effect to equip a dragon isn't optional
Feugan
10-15-2008, 02:31 AM
cyberdarks effect to equip a dragon isn't optional
What he said ^
lol.
Plus Yes I will be adding in Comp. Evacs for this meta, it hurts synchros! :D
Terano
10-15-2008, 06:52 AM
Indeed.
But creature swaping an early cyberdark when there is no dragon in grave is a good idea.
//T
Feugan
10-15-2008, 07:44 AM
No it isnt. Then I'll summon/RotA Army Knight or Dark Grepher, hence ditching a dragon and saving my CyDarks for their real purpose.... -.-
Im_So_Hood
10-15-2008, 09:06 AM
Magna Drago FTW????
GGled
10-15-2008, 09:52 AM
Good point, I didn't realise that it wasn't optional to equip a Cyberdark.
Mr. Boombastic
10-15-2008, 09:59 AM
even if it was optional it would still be a bad idea >.<
Dark-Lord9
10-15-2008, 10:02 AM
no cyberdark impact the magic card? Are you on crack?
Im_So_Hood
10-15-2008, 10:14 AM
Just noticed that myself, you should play at least one.
Additional Comment:
No Dragon's Mirror/Monster Reincarnation either????
Nishimaster
10-15-2008, 10:15 AM
Dragons mirror is terrible :/ monster reincarnation is kinda meh aswell
Cyberdark Impact is ok, possibly run 1 at max
Feugan
10-17-2008, 07:54 AM
even if it was optional it would still be a bad idea >.<
Too true, Jutte is much more searchable, with the same level.
no cyberdark impact the magic card? Are you on crack?
Dude the fusion isn't all it's cracked up to be; the card is waaay too situational, although I may test it out...
Just noticed that myself, you should play at least one.
No Dragon's Mirror/Monster Reincarnation either????
Dragons Mirror eats Cydark food..... :( Cyberdarks don't like being hungry... If they get hungry they'll hunt you down! They'll hunt you down and eats j0o!
Hi Toast
Do you think he should add a Shapesnatch?
What the hell??? Give it a rest!!!!!!
Dragons mirror is terrible :/ monster reincarnation is kinda meh aswell
Cyberdark Impact is ok, possibly run 1 at max
Personally I dont see the point in Reincarnation, I run 8 Cyberdarks which should be enough... although I do have a 1/e Ulti that I could put to use... :p
and I might run ONE CdIp!, for one reason and one reason only....
Nishi told me to....
vBulletin®, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.