View Full Version : Shoukansou Gadget
Asuka_Tenjoin
01-18-2007, 01:25 PM
3 Shoukansou Summon Priest
3 Red Gadget
3 Yellow Gadget
3 Green Gadget
3 Sacred Crane
3 Elemental Hero Airman
2 Snipe Hunter
1 Breaker the Magical Warrior
1 Graceful Charity
3 Hammer Shot
3 Smashing Ground
1 Heavy Storm
1 Mystical Space Typhoon
3 Fissure
1 Pot of Avarice
1 Premature Burial
2 Fuuin no Ougonhitsu
1 Mirror Force
3 Sakuretsu Armor
3 Widespread Ruin
1 Call Of The Haunted
Total: 45
Airknight
01-18-2007, 02:32 PM
no ring!? what is Fuuin no Ougonhitsu btw?? and is it me or people dont really like ultimate offering in gadget deck?? i barely see it in any gadget deck, but i use one in mine, helpful most of the time, its like a stein...
Asuka_Tenjoin
01-18-2007, 04:35 PM
Ring of Destruction is really bad in the ocg meta. Fuuin no Ougonhitsu is Golden Sealed Chest.
Ultimate Offering at one = no.
Airknight
01-18-2007, 04:37 PM
Ring of Destruction is really bad in the ocg meta. Fuuin no Ougonhitsu is Golden Sealed Chest.
Ultimate Offering at one = no.
no ring because of Gors?? and why not for ultimate offering??
Asuka_Tenjoin
01-18-2007, 04:43 PM
Like I stated before
Ultimate Offering at one = no
Are you trying to start another flame war? If you are I suggest you stop.
Airknight
01-18-2007, 05:06 PM
Like I stated before
Ultimate Offering at one = no
Are you trying to start another flame war? If you are I suggest you stop.
no... just wondering. cos i never hear the reason why people dont like it...
if i wanna start a flame war, i'd go like 'put in an ultimate offering' noob... anyway, if you dont wanna answer, ignore this post then...
hinotama
01-18-2007, 06:27 PM
Like I stated before
Ultimate Offering at one = no
Are you trying to start another flame war? If you are I suggest you stop.
How about Ultimate Offering at 2 then? How could Ring be bad??
Asuka_Tenjoin
01-18-2007, 06:30 PM
You people are trying to start a flame war again. God, I'm not that dense
Ultimate offering is limited. ARE YOU BLIND? CAN'T YOU READ THE BAN LIST?
Ring is bad because of Meifu no Shisha Goes, and I don't feel like losing my life, when I already have enough monster destruction.
I post a deck here, thinking to get some fixes. All I get is people trying to annoy me.
hinotama
01-18-2007, 06:42 PM
That's because the deck is already perfect.
Asuka_Tenjoin
01-18-2007, 06:50 PM
No deck is perfect.
monarchoverkill
01-18-2007, 07:58 PM
what is the meta like in japan riht now? Do u know???
Additional Comment:
what else is being run over there? i know like dimensional fissure, summon priest, gadgets, but what else is being ran. What would u say is the deck to beat there???
Akatsuki
01-19-2007, 03:34 AM
what is the meta like in japan riht now? Do u know???
Additional Comment:
what else is being run over there? i know like dimensional fissure, summon priest, gadgets, but what else is being ran. What would u say is the deck to beat there??? Please. There are a lot of threads around here about the meta. Don't ask such noob questions. Ok? Especially in a deck thread where the starter can lose their temper very quickly :p .I think your information is old. Many run a Airman Turbo with some other monsters, or Dark World Variants of the Cookie Cutter (at least in Shanghai).
Anyways, Asuka, I think that maybe you can think about Goes in this deck.
Twilight
01-19-2007, 03:57 AM
Would Magical Blast work in here? With all the deck thinning due to Airman, GSC and Gadgets as well as Sacred Crane, would you miss the draw all that much?
It looks really great!
Asuka_Tenjoin
01-19-2007, 09:21 AM
Magic Blast can work. However, it is not needed with all the dead magic cards I will have.
Meifu no Shisha Goes is not needed. My field will always have something.
ramses
01-19-2007, 10:07 AM
Asuka: Your Main deck l00ks awesome. No fixes in there.
But could we please see your sidedeck in order to foresee "miror matches"?
Rakath
01-19-2007, 10:14 AM
I wanna say:
-1 Hammer
-1 Fissure
Simply to trim down the deckcount a bit. You got plenty of thin and draw, but 45? Also you already have 18 ways to kill a monster.
Gladstone_Gladiator
01-20-2007, 12:49 PM
Its a Very good deck. W/ such speed, no one would be able to beat you in a match early on the any dual.
Aarikku
01-21-2007, 06:58 PM
I'd just like to know why you don't want to use Ultimate Offering. I can understand that you don't, but as of yet, your reasonings have been little more than unusual math equations.
Asuka_Tenjoin
01-22-2007, 08:29 AM
Drawing a card at one that is heavily needed is not as consistent as if it was at two or more.
Even if I do draw it, the card would probably be a dead draw. With Shoukansou Summon Priest on the field, I can summon up to two monsters each turn.
Aarikku
01-22-2007, 04:18 PM
By your first point, you also shouldn't be using Premature Burial, Heavy Storm, MST, Graceful Charity, PoA, Mirror Force or Call either.
The part about already having enough swarm makes sense, though.
Asuka_Tenjoin
01-23-2007, 06:56 AM
Yeah, I see what you mean. But, they're staples. >_>
Aarikku
01-23-2007, 02:04 PM
Staples are used because they help decks, like Ultimate Offering would. I actually tried said combo today - very fun, efficient swarm.
But hey, your deck. Not mine. Just this is the kind of fix that could get you flamed and your thread eventually locked. We've both seen it happen.
Goriyaku
02-03-2007, 11:07 PM
I know this may seem like a newbie question but why/how is ring bad in the OCG meta?
Akatsuki
02-04-2007, 02:40 AM
I know this may seem like a newbie question but why/how is ring bad in the OCG meta?Cuz of Goes. Really, this deck is good enough.
VampireGod
02-04-2007, 09:05 AM
wonderful deck, ms tenjoin... About the only change I'd make is -1 call and +1 torrential. I have noticed, in playing my gadget deck, that call is a little slow for it. It may work for you tho, so if you like it, keep it. Just a thought :)
vBulletin®, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.