BSkullKid
11-28-2006, 09:32 PM
It seems that too many reviews and ratings are based on a card against others of the same name, which skews from the card's actual qualities within the game as a whole. Sure, a card could be somewhat worse than another card, but that shouldnt mean a card that's avg. 4/5 in effectiveness should be rated 3/5 just because there's another copy that's 4.2/5. Just thought I'd share my opinion. I know, it's pointless somewhat...