View Full Version : A card you want banned by the end of 2006!
Alantianlionheart56
01-08-2006, 07:33 PM
D.D Assalant or cyber dragon I know what your going to say there in everyone's deck but, think sabout it these cards destory a lot of decks!
BeeLegendary
01-08-2006, 07:37 PM
They will not get banned. they will be restricted to 1 by the end of 2006, maybe! these cards do not destroy a lot of deck. what destroy a lot of deck are the cards that's on the current ban list. LOL :p
Ordyh
01-08-2006, 07:38 PM
they wont even be limited(maybe DDA to 2, but not cyber if that) and this is in the wrong section....
l:.Elemental.:l
01-08-2006, 07:42 PM
cyber wont be banned for one reason: cyber end dragon. it needs 3 cybers to fuse for it (until SOI, when proto cyber dragon comes out)...DDA may be restricted to 2, but not banned.
anyway a card i want banned: chaos scorcerror (sp?)
topspin1617
01-08-2006, 07:44 PM
There aren't really any cards I want banned, unless it's to compensate for certain cards coming off the list.
YGO_Master
01-08-2006, 07:44 PM
There are going to be alot of new cards and 2 ban lists, 2006 have just started there is no way i can say now.
UFOroidFighter
01-08-2006, 07:47 PM
1)This needs to be moved
2)DDA will be at 1 cause it is broken as hell
3)Cyber Dragon will be ay 1 cause by the next ban list Proto will be out so that CyEnDr isnt an excuse for wanting it at 2-3
EDIT:4)I want to see Snapsactch banned, that is just broken
Beast of Gilfer
01-08-2006, 07:49 PM
Cyber Dragon and DD Assailant don't even bother me. The cards I want banned are Exiled Force and Snatch Steal. I know Exiled Force isn't broken but it is extremely good and annoying. The restrictions I hope for is Brain Control and the unrestriction of Abyss Soldier. The rest is fine for me.
zephyr_
01-08-2006, 07:50 PM
IMO mobius might be restricted.
Im not saying I want it its just that it might happen...
Zazabi
01-08-2006, 07:54 PM
You only want them banned because you don't have any? :o
They're strong but not that strong, in all actuality. Some decks don't need either to operate any how.
golden
01-08-2006, 07:56 PM
Dark hole is okay but snatch steal is not!!!!!
`Phenom
01-08-2006, 07:59 PM
I want cards to be limited or semi, but banned...none.
Yugioh fan
01-08-2006, 08:00 PM
I want pot! Not graceful b/c then dark world is broken. Not Deligant(sp) becuase thats just grr. I just want pot of greed.
bettis36
01-08-2006, 08:38 PM
i would like to see either heavy storm or jinzo be banned.
Adivina_quien__soy
01-08-2006, 08:43 PM
I don't like cards to be banned!! it takes all the fun form the game!
Retain
01-08-2006, 08:44 PM
Don't want any cards banned :p.
Though I do want some to be limited/semi-limited, such as DDA =].
Yami-B
01-08-2006, 08:49 PM
You all want cards to be banned to stop CC, and it will never happen. Their will always be dominant cards in this game, and they will be in everyones deck.
DDA is not that broken, it has to be destroyed, and half the time the opponent suicides it.
Cyber Dragon is the only that might need restriction, only because of Inferno Reckless Summmoning coming in the Duelist packs.
Beast of Gilfer
01-08-2006, 08:50 PM
Don't want any cards banned :p.
Though I do want some to be limited/semi-limited, such as DDA =].
I believe the reason they didn't limit DDA is because Zombie/Phoenix's power would grow maybe a little to much.
Skater_Strike
01-08-2006, 08:50 PM
cyber wont be banned for one reason: cyber end dragon. it needs 3 cybers to fuse for it (until SOI, when proto cyber dragon comes out)...DDA may be restricted to 2, but not banned.
anyway a card i want banned: chaos scorcerror (sp?)
They banned Witch of the Black Forest, does it look like they care you can't use Sanwitch?
cardman
01-08-2006, 09:11 PM
DDA isn't the bestest card in the world (i know bestest isn't a word) , but I wouldn't mind semi restricting them.
Shadow of Death
01-08-2006, 09:16 PM
who knows, maybe they'll ban heavy storm, with breaker at 1, mobius unrestricted, dust tornado unrestricted, and mst at 1 (for who knows why, because dust tornado is at 3) it's not that bad of a trade off. Probably switch back dark hole and mirror force like usual. D.D. Assailant at 1 or 2 and Cyber Dragon at 2 (come on, you don't really need more than that anyway)
C9XGMR
01-08-2006, 09:18 PM
To me, nothing needs to be ban. Unless the future has something for us.
Centric
01-08-2006, 09:30 PM
I agree C9XGMR, nothing needs to be banned right now. I say the closest card to being banned is Snatch Steal but there is alot of M/T removal in this format so I dont think it will be put into much consideration.
D. D. Survivor is the reason D. D. Assaliant wont get restricted.
Pacman
01-08-2006, 09:35 PM
Dark Hole needs to be banned, Heavy Storm needs to be banned, MST to 2, and snatch also needs to go...
ehwar
01-08-2006, 09:40 PM
brain control-1
mst-2
dd assailant 2
cyber dragon-1
ban- darkhole, snatchsteal, premature burial & sangan
:eek:
No/name
01-08-2006, 09:43 PM
Man it is all about D.D Assalant, there is not more thought in a deck now I am sick of it.
YoshaneTheDarkest
01-08-2006, 09:45 PM
im sick beyond reason of snatch steal, its annoying and arguably better than change of heart wich had to get banned
motxmod
01-08-2006, 09:46 PM
They banned Witch of the Black Forest, does it look like they care you can't use Sanwitch?
that is true, since we have fusion substitution monsters. But I think that DDA and Cyber dragon do need a restriction.
Paladinseer007
01-08-2006, 09:51 PM
brain control-1
mst-2
dd assailant 2
cyber dragon-1
ban- darkhole, snatchsteal, premature burial & sangan
:eek:
Just out of curiousity, why ban snatch steal and sangan, because in my opinion in the past they haven't caused any problems or now even. :)
airknight 20
01-08-2006, 10:00 PM
I do not think anything needs to be banned at the moment, not even restricted. Besides, as long as people keep netdecking there will always be CC decks, no matter how many cards they decide to ban, and you know why........the system is too simple: Spells, Traps and Monsters, and that's it. ;)
Kopaka of Ice
01-08-2006, 10:04 PM
Just out of curiousity, why ban snatch steal and sangan, because in my opinion in the past they haven't caused any problems or now even. :)
Sangan gives you a chance to choose any 1500 or less ATK monster from your deck with no cost other than his own destruction. You can pretty much abuse him in many ways. It's a little obvious about what Sangan is capable of. But does he deserve a ban? Not as much as Witch of the Black Forest but maybe.
Snatch Steal is free "Mind Control" for face-up monsters. It has not cost and gives you a free monster to work with while removing an advantage from your opponent that they may have worked a bit harder for. With Brain Control and Creature Swap as well as many other "Mind Control" cards around, we really shouldn't need Snatch Steal to pick up the slack of Change of Heart being banned. Most of the time I see Snatch Steal, it's only for 1 turn. Steal enemy monster > Beat on the opponent > Tribute (can be interchanged with beat on the opponent).
kool kaiba
01-08-2006, 10:07 PM
DDA-2
Cyber D-2
Brain Control-1
Sak-2
Widespread-2
Nothing really needs to banned at this point. Only some restrictions need to be put in place.
Game_Boy87
01-08-2006, 10:15 PM
I would like:
1x DDA
1x Cyber Dragon
1x Brain Control
1x Sak Armor
2x Widespread
2x Smashing Ground
Banned:
Snatch Steal
Off the list:
3x Abyss Soldier
This does not have to be permanent and it would help continue the diversity. This would help eliminate all of the 1 for 1's and force people to try something new.
DigiAngel
01-08-2006, 10:24 PM
I'm really happy with the way the list is now,I JUST WANT GRACEFUL CHARITY BACK!!!
Because it is so very,very pretty.
Souljer
01-08-2006, 10:24 PM
Nothing needs to be restricted. Definitely not banned.
EDIT:
Graceful Charity is not coming back. Ever hear of the monsters of Dark World?
DarkMaigican25
01-08-2006, 10:43 PM
Banned
Torrential Tribute and/or rotate Dark Hole
Limited
Mirror Force
Brain Control
Soul Exchange
Return from a Different Dimension
D.D. Assailant
Cyber Dragon
Reinforcements of the Army
Enemy Controller
Sak. Armor
Semi-Limited
Book of Taiyou
Widespread Ruins
Book of Life
Chaos Sorcerer
Mobuis the Frost Monarch
Strike Ninja
From the Banned List Bring Back
Black Luster Soldier-Envoy of the Beginning
Butterfly Dagger-Elma
Change of Heart
Chaos Emperor Dragon-Envoy of the End
Delinquent Duo
Fiber Jar
Graceful Charity
Harpie’s Feather Duster
Imperial Order
Magical Scientist
Makyura the Destructor
Mirage of Nightmare
Mirror Force
Monster Reborn
Painful Choice
Raigeki
Ring of Destruction
Sinister Serpent
Sixth Sense (in Japan)
The Forceful Sentry
Tribe Infecting Virus
Witch of the Black Forest
Yata-Garsu
Just Kidding :D
Shadow The Unborn
01-08-2006, 10:48 PM
Don FREAKING ZALOOG!!!! a hand wrecking, deck picking machine. people say cyber dragon needs to go... but he NEEDS TO LEAVE THE WORST!!! (Or @ least limited)
King of Dragon
01-08-2006, 11:14 PM
Only two cards thats getting too much talk for their worth.
DDA may have a small chance at being 2 per deck, but most run two anyway.
Cyber Dragon has no decent reason to be put on the list at all. Its a beatstick that can be special summoned. That's scary.... At worse it runs through conservative play with another monster and deal major damage. That's a playstyle problem not Cyber Dragon's
:rolleyes: The smartest move ever by Konami, screw a theme, nothing hurts the decks that abuse it because its so pointless in those decks it can be tossed out without a problem. The people using the theme have to settle for crap as backup and others just laugh dodging a bullet and yelling use Proto. Even E-Hero Wildman serves more of a purpose splashed into decks than Cyber Dragon.
Bankotsu the Great
01-08-2006, 11:15 PM
I want to see Reinforcements of the Army banned, or at least put to 1 per deck.
BabYcakes
01-08-2006, 11:45 PM
banned:
snatch steal
dark hole
unbanned:
mirror force
painful choice
restricted to 1:
cyber dragon
dd assailant
spirit reaper
reinforcements of the army
sakuretsu armor
restricted to 2:
scapegoat
limiter removal
magic cylinder
i think that would diversify things a bit more.
Black Tyranno
01-09-2006, 12:35 AM
Restrict:
DD Assailant
Semi:
Limiter Removal
Unrestrict:
Abyss Soldier
That is all.
Yugimonz
01-09-2006, 02:03 AM
D.D Assalant or cyber dragon I know what your going to say there in everyone's deck but, think sabout it these cards destory a lot of decks!
i think the list is fine rite now (semi/limited) i dont think they need to change it but maybe take some cards off the forbbien list i would like to maybe have fiber jar back i dont know i like the list the way it is dont want any changes
darkendlink
01-09-2006, 02:55 AM
Ban
Reinforcement(to much power to warriors)
Restrit to one
Cyber Dragon
Spirit Reaper
D.D. Assailant
Chaos Sorcerer
Unban
Mirror Force
Graceful Charity
Painful Choice
SaintDragon7777
01-09-2006, 03:10 AM
I leave everything into konami and upperdecks capable hands. Since this new list is good except for the fact that DDA was left alone.
Restrict DDA
Leave Cyber Dragon at 3's so its own deck casn live. I believe a theme cyber dragon deck can be a tier 2 or higher deck.
and they can do what they want as long as its balance out like this list.
pilchard8
01-09-2006, 03:25 AM
Banned:
Snatch Steal
Restricted:
DDA
Cyber
Spirit Reaper (how annoying are they)
Brain Control
wrathchild
01-09-2006, 03:41 AM
D.D Assalant or cyber dragon I know what your going to say there in everyone's deck but, think sabout it these cards destory a lot of decks!
ban dda and cyber dragon?! :eek:
nah, thats too much for those cards. theyll probably be restricted but not banned, if dda gets restricted Ill be happy :) , cyber dragon doesnt really need restriction its basically an unsearchable marauding capt. with 2100 atk, thats all, cyber dragon is overated.
What I hope gets banned in 06 is dark hole and heavy, and hopefully well get a heavy storm replacement like unholy calamity or something.
Maximillion Pegasus
01-09-2006, 04:00 AM
Banned:
Snatch Steal
Restricted:
DDA
Cyber
Spirit Reaper (how annoying are they)
Brain Control
Agreed. I think it'll be interesting with no SS for a while. DDA/Spirit Reaper should be limited to 2 IMO.
I don't think Cyber Dragon will be restricted, I don't know why however I just don't see it happening.
Brain Control - meh. I would only run 1 anyway, maybe 2 in Soul Control so I don't see it being limited to two much of a problem.
Z_Havock
01-09-2006, 04:03 AM
banned:
snatch steal
dark hole
unbanned:
mirror force
painful choice
restricted to 1:
cyber dragon
dd assailant
spirit reaper
reinforcements of the army
sakuretsu armor
restricted to 2:
scapegoat
limiter removal
magic cylinder
i think that would diversify things a bit more.
I can agree with whats going to be banned, but i dont think they are gona restrict S.armour, then bring back mirror force? i dont see why cyber and DDA will go to one, two is more likely.
but i totaly agree with your restricted to two, i dont think limiter removel and cyclinder are causing that much damage these days
id like to see Pot back......its never gona happen, but i like the feeling you get when u draw it, a lil happy feeling... :o
Xaylen
01-09-2006, 04:29 AM
Man,D.D. Assailant and Cyber have really turned this game into a "if you have 2,place them in your deck' game.....Screw them.> : (.
I dont even have them and they're still so over-powered,lol.
Lets see:
Ban:
Snatch Steal
Dark Hole
Heavy Storm
Breaker(Yes,you read right.A 1900 ATKer with a built-in MST....Overpowered,IMO.)
Limited:
DDA
ROTA
Spirit Reapers(Not because i dont like them,but because these are so commonly run..)
Sakuretsu Armor
Semi-Limited:
Limiter Removal
Cyber Dragon
Unbanned:
None
Off the list:
Mage Power(Lol J/k.None.)
Yeah...I hope Scapegoat doesnt become Semi-Limited....Its so annoying,and so...I dunno.....I just dont like the idea of it being Semi-Limited....
[X]
Chronos
01-09-2006, 04:30 AM
Why am I seeing posts to unrestrict Abyss Soldier? he has the potential to do more damage than DDA, he's a 4star 2000 atk monster that continues to bounce opponents monsters or s/t's at the cost of a water monster from the hand, that can lead to a lot more abuse than a DDA, if it was unrestricted Id use 3 Frostys and 3 Abyss just for that.
Makuku
01-09-2006, 04:32 AM
I'd be happy seeing Spirit Reaper and DDA limited, and maybe Dark Hole banned again..
akiracage
01-09-2006, 04:40 AM
I could see cards that have spell immunity (Horus LV 8) to get banned in the future but thats not likely. Also I could see pot of avarice restricted and dda and cyber dragon limited to 2.
-toonbakuraryou-
topspin1617
01-09-2006, 05:27 AM
Let's see...
Ban:
Smashing Ground
Fissure
Trap Hole
Cyber Jar
Catapult Turtle
Mystical Space Typhoon
Restrict:
Hammer Shot
Bottomless Trap Hole
Sakuretsu Armor
Widespread Ruin
Giant Trunade
Semi-Restrict:
Scapegoat
Tsukuyomi
Metamorphosis
Book of Moon
Book of Taiyou
Sacred Phoenix of Nephthys
Hand of Nephthys
Reflect Bounder
Limiter Removal
Unban:
Harpie's Feather Duster
Raigeki
Magical Scientist
Graceful Charity
Painful Choice
Mirror Force
Tribe Infecting Virus
IN GOD WE TRUST
01-09-2006, 05:42 AM
U think they destroy alot of decks because you probaly can't handle the might of them. Just get over it and assept them. It's not like they go in every deck. Almost but, not every deck. They are cookies. Not 100% cookie.
IN GOD WE TRUST
01-09-2006, 05:43 AM
Let's see...
Ban:
Smashing Ground
Fissure
Trap Hole
Cyber Jar
Catapult Turtle
Mystical Space Typhoon
Restrict:
Hammer Shot
Bottomless Trap Hole
Sakuretsu Armor
Widespread Ruin
Giant Trunade
Semi-Restrict:
Scapegoat
Tsukuyomi
Metamorphosis
Book of Moon
Book of Taiyou
Sacred Phoenix of Nephthys
Hand of Nephthys
Reflect Bounder
Limiter Removal
Unban:
Harpie's Feather Duster
Raigeki
Magical Scientist
Graceful Charity
Painful Choice
Mirror Force
Tribe Infecting Virus
u r crazy. thes band, restricts, and etc make no since.
blue_yami_91
01-09-2006, 07:29 AM
I want cards to be limited or semi, but banned...none.
cheers to that!
Seto1138
01-09-2006, 08:17 AM
Unban
Mirror Force
Graceful Charity
Painful Choice
Ok So Dark world will be come the new CC deck. Come on think.
Baz0r-
01-09-2006, 08:24 AM
Dark Hole, its a broken card.
I dont want other things in the ban list
Mr. C
01-09-2006, 08:33 AM
People can complain about certain cards not being banned but when they are there is something else that comes off the ban list that they complain about. What i am getting at is no matter how much you guys complain it wont change a thing. There will always be a card you don't like. Deal with it.
Slayer
01-09-2006, 08:54 AM
Dark Hole, this card is to broken it should the ban again. The rest of the list is ok.
Tu101uk
01-09-2006, 09:12 AM
i'm intrigued as to what konami and UDE have in store for us for the next restricted list... they have surprised us in the past, and the next list should be no different...
methinks mirror force will most probably come back for dark hole... mirror force has been on and off for some time now... and the last of the pre-negators, The Forceful Sentry, might make an appearence for confiscation (i know it hasn't been an impact for this list, but having both out in the next list is just silly)...
i'm indifferent to DDA and Cyber Dragons... but, like DDWL, i can see them restricting DDA to one... semi-restricting limiter removal might help machine decks that bit better, and unrestricting upstart goblin would be cool (only because i run bad reaction to simochi decks and it's been stuck at semi-restricted for god knows how long T_T)...
i wouldn't mind graceful charity back (one of my favourite spell cards, but very unlikely unless konami/ude want dark world to be a dominant archetype)... but i would settle for pot of greed coming back, just to bring a little bit more speed back into the game...
there maybe a big surprise unbanning... they've been doing those since the first lists... what it will be, we can't even begin to guess... but monster reborn, change of heart or painful choice would be really meta-changing...
whatever the changes, we've just gotta take it on the chin and make the most of it...
O-O~
Chronos
01-09-2006, 09:28 AM
Bringing back Monster reborn would heavily impact things but I think for that theyd ban Call, leave us with premmy and give us MR.
neowater
01-09-2006, 09:35 AM
D.D Assalant or cyber dragon I know what your going to say there in everyone's deck but, think sabout it these cards destory a lot of decks!
DDA will go to 1 0r 2
Cyber Dragon I doubt will be banned maybe Semi limit at most
The Four Horsemen
01-09-2006, 09:41 AM
Cyber dragon will go to 1, assailant to 2, and i want to see the sorcerer get banned
Yugimonz
01-09-2006, 09:50 AM
Cyber dragon will go to 1, assailant to 2, and i want to see the sorcerer get banned
what
i dont think cyber dragon will goto 1 not that good really it can be over beat by anything with 4 stars and higher attack and for dda i think it might goto 2 but i dont know
if ude/konami keep restricting cards every time a new list comes out then sooner or latter evry card will be at 1 or 2 per deck
cards i want on the semi-list are
Deck Devastation Virus
Limiter Removal
Reckless Greed
Reflect Bounder
Sacred Phoenix of Nephthys
mystical space typhoon - just cuz i wanna use 2 in my deck
PhoenixTamer
01-09-2006, 10:07 AM
What is everyone's deal with this Cyber Dragon and DDA needs restrictions or be banned. Everything in this format shows that everything is balanced so there's no need to ban or restrict any cards right now.
WolfCypher
01-09-2006, 10:09 AM
New Banned:
Snatch Steal
Sakuretsu Armor (Is it just me, or would I rather have everyone use 1 MF than 3 SA and Widespreads?)
New Limited:
D.D. Assialant
Pot of Greed
Mirror Force
Painful Choice (Actually I just read a topic on this. Now I'm not so sure I want it back!)
Brain Control
New Semi:
Reflect Bounder
Abyss Soldier
Silvaa
Goldd
Magician of Faith
Dust Tornado (it may be slower than MST but dammit it's still just as great!)
ApocalypseNow25
01-09-2006, 01:04 PM
Cyber dragon will go to 1, assailant to 2, and i want to see the sorcerer get banned
NO just No, besides the format as it is now is good we have three decks that are good and the rest are fairly balanced in terms of Power, this is the best format for the game.
topspin1617
01-09-2006, 02:40 PM
u r crazy. thes band, restricts, and etc make no since.
Sure they do.
I'm sorry if you can't see why.
Anyway, I'd like to test a list like that on YVD with someone, so I can see why everyone is complaining.
Airknight
01-09-2006, 04:05 PM
snatch- cheap removel
premature- seriously, this card can go, if you wanna use revivals, use theme deck.
call- see above
cant think of any others now~~
SaintDragon7777
01-09-2006, 10:50 PM
What is everyone's deal with this Cyber Dragon and DDA needs restrictions or be banned. Everything in this format shows that everything is balanced so there's no need to ban or restrict any cards right now.
Its ovious isn't it? I personally think this ban list is very good with the exception of DDA. DDA causes too much problem for other decks thats not FFC, Soul, and CC. Its a beatstick with removal effect. Monsters like blue eyes, mantacore, necrofear, pheonix, vampire lord, ryu koki, horus, silent swordsman, tyrant dragon, and any fusion or tribute mosnters that might see play by duelist who got enough guts to try and play them gets run over by DDA. DDA is 1700 which means he can take down almost any monster thats needed to help summon or speed up decks taht uses these monsters. Then when you actaully summon it you attack a face up or down DDA and it gets killed and even worst gets removed if you are lucky enough to get pass all them saku armors and smashing grounds.
Tim17
01-09-2006, 11:45 PM
hmm, my thoughts on this subject....
MST ought to go back semi-limited
DDA needs to be restricted by some means....banned or limited (as most ppl already use 2) just to disrupt CC some
Cyber, down to two when Proto is released....
Heavy Storm should stay (chances of drawing it early in the game are what on average?)
Pot of Avarice doesn't need to be restricted....not many ppl use it currently, but if it does, perhaps semi-limited for starts.....
Brain Control....needs to be restricted by some means.....
Snatch Steal is broken, but I'm not positive if it needs to go just yet...
that's all I have for now.
Alexander Anderson
01-10-2006, 01:41 AM
Banned:
Cyber Stein (Oh please! Dear God, I hate this thing!!!)
Cyber Stein using duelist - "Hurm A face down monster and 1 M/T? MST, Dark Hole, Pay 5000 LP, Summon Cyber end Dragon, Megamorph, Game. Dee dee dee! I is a gewd duelist!"
Me - No. You're You have a one hit kill in an otherwise crappy deck and manage to pull it off every first turn. If you didn't have that one card, I'd kick your butt.
Cyber Stein using duelist - Nuh uh!
Me - You make me so bitter...
Tim17
01-10-2006, 09:17 PM
I don't think Cyber Stein ought to be banned, restricted - yes, but not banned, and just to let you know, I don't own one at all.
austinzc3
01-11-2006, 03:29 PM
My idea's
Ban= MST, Heavy Storm, Exiled Force
Limit= Cyber Stein, DDA, DDW,DDM, PoG, PoA, and Royal Decree
Semi= Sak Armor, Cyber Dragon(don't care what anyone says), and Mystic Swordsman lv2, lv4, and lv6
mikej
01-11-2006, 04:26 PM
I don't think Cyber Stein ought to be banned, restricted - yes, but not banned, and just to let you know, I don't own one at all.
More like Cyber Stein getting restricted making it harder fot CyED OTK then semi Limiter to help other Machine decks that lack Limiters in 2s of 3s
You cant say "by the end of 2006"
since u dont know what is going to be released until then..
Rather say what card u would have wanted to be banned
Before 2006?
.:|S0MBЯA|:.
01-12-2006, 02:09 PM
Ben Kei!!!!
Romancer
01-12-2006, 03:27 PM
D.D. Assailant needs to be restricted to 1. In many ways, she's better than D.D. Warrior Lady, who was rightfully limited to 1 per deck.
Cyber Dragons might not be limited, but they probably should be to curb their abuse. Then again, it's not fair to the people who want to run Cyber Dragon or Ryo decks to have them limited just as the rest of the cards come out to build the deck. I wouldn't be suprised if Cyber Dragon didn't get limited in the next rotation.
zgoxten
01-13-2006, 03:04 PM
Dark Hole, can be a free +1 advantage.
DDA isn't a +1 it's a 0 most of the time, but can be a -1 with D.D. Survivor. Cyber shouldn't be ban either cause it's still destroyed as easily as any other monster. They swarm? That's why there's Smashing and Sakuretsu. If they limit Smashing, Sakuretsu, Hammer Shot, and Fissure, and if they ban Dark Hole; Cyber they can be ban.
Cyber Stein, just be prepared for it. Side some Wabokus, blah blah blah. It's kinda your fault if you loose to it cause you're not prepared for it.
bmxbunnie17
01-13-2006, 10:18 PM
They banned Witch of the Black Forest, does it look like they care you can't use Sanwitch?
cause you can use dark hex to bring out sanwitch you cant use the hex fusion to bring out the cyber fusions witch is why they will not limmitmm cyber dragon
The_Gravekeeper
01-15-2006, 11:53 AM
Last Turn
Ben Kei
Cyber Stein
All of those because in a good Adv format there should be 0 FTK/OTK combos
jshadow01
01-15-2006, 09:57 PM
i hope they jus bring bak one of the envoys lol
JBauer24
01-16-2006, 12:24 AM
They might not limit/semi limit/ban cyber dragon, but they should ban megamorph (so easy to pull off), limiter removal (even easier to pull off), and limit power bond(So many fusions.more ways to make them) and cyber-stein (This card is a pain. Period) to make the infamous Cyber End OTK dissapear
vBulletin®, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.